Sonically good.


Writing's a fight and this boy needs a battle
Sonically good.

I don’t want to debate the possible destruction of the independent film industry in this country. I agree the lack of many things will force creators to follow the money, and head to the States. I agree the destruction of the independent film sector would deprive audiences of original films.
I disagree that Netflix will make it harder for independent producers to make their movies.
Yes Netflix are bypassing the theatrical release of films. For some theatrical release is the last way to define a film as a film. It’s an obsession I think we need to get past. I fear if we’re not careful, we’re in danger of fetishising theatrical release, to the detriment of the bigger picture, telling stories and making movies.
These days the majority of films aren’t actually films, in the traditional sense of the word. Only a handful of titles are actually shot on celluloid, most are shot digitally, and when they do get a theatrical release, they’re delivered to theatres on hard drives and projected digitally. All of the analogue processes that went into the making a film are gone, replaced by their digital equivalent.
The only part left of films analogue past is a release into theatres.
Steven Spielberg was recently at the forefront of a campaign to have The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences change their rules. The campaign wanted movies made for streaming services excluded from the Oscars. He argued they should be considered television movies and submitted to the Emmy Awards. The US Department of Justice warned The Academy, they could be breaking antitrust laws, if they exclude Netflix movies. I’m afraid Mr Spielberg is clinging to an anachronism. We have to accept that theatrical release does not a film make.
The Netflix model is not perfect, but it filled a gap created by the studios. Hollywood abandoned independent films, and went all-in on bigger budget, franchise and superhero extravaganzas. Netflix simply filled that hole in the market.
Later this year Disney will launch its own streaming service. It will not only offer Disney’s entire back catalogue, but also the catalogues of Marvel, Star Wars, Fox, and National Geographic. That’s a huge premium catalogue to compete against. Disney will also, at some point, pull all of their content from Netflix. Netflix have responded by increasing production, and sourcing original content from around the world. That has to be good for independent producers. Our stories will get told, our films made, but only if we stop obsessing over theatrical release, and embrace streaming.
Side note: Flicking though the UK catalogue of Netflix reveals a diversity of movies and television shows from around the world. That has to be good for independent producers?
For me the antagonism towards Netflix asks a bigger question. What defines a movie? It’s the same question books faced more than a decade ago. Does a book stop being a novel if it’s read on a Kindle? I would say no. How you read the novel is irrelevant. Hard copy or not, that’s just the delivery format. Some people have chosen to fetishise the novel in its analogue form, as if a book suddenly stops being a novel, when it’s read on something other than ink on paper. Films are being crammed into the same headspace. A movie doesn’t suddenly stop being a film because it’s streamed to a home theatre system.
Our idea of film is like the rest of our language, always evolving. These days I’d define a movie as a self-contained story, a plot with a beginning, a middle, and an end. How I watch it is less important. I’m not trying to deny the theatrical experience. There is something magical about sitting in a theatre, but it’s not the only way to watch a movie.
In the end it really is about telling a story. If it engages you, who cares how you watch it.

A movie that has its moments, but they’re so coated in cheese, you might mistake them for fondue. It’s trying so hard to be the Goonies, or ET, or Gremlins, it forgets to be itself.

What happens when you mix Boxing Helena (1993) with Death Wish (1974), blended it with a Hostel (2005), you’d get a wonderfully twisted Dead Ringers (1988) for 2018.

Netflix fills the gap created by the studios when they vacated the lot and doubled down on blockbusters. The studio’s loss is Netflix gain. How long before someone like Apple makes a bid for Netflix?
Spinning-off Z Nation (2014-2018), The Asylum’s copycat of The Walking Dead, Black Summer feels grounded, dare I say it, serious. The Asylum are “notorious for producing titles that capitalise on productions by major studios” but this feels like something out on it’s own, rather than piggybacking on a bigger title. They’re not playing for laughs, the way Z Nation does, but digging into the urgency, the fear, the drama, in the early days of the zombie apocalypse.

Interesting collection of shorts, some looking a lot like trailers for games, but they each had something to offer.

In an exclusive report by Ted Johnson in Variety reveals the US Justice Department has warned the “Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences that its potential rule changes limiting the eligibility of Netflix and other streaming services for the Oscars could raise antitrust concerns and violate competition law”.

I think the Academy and Steven Spielberg are on the wrong side of this. Rule changes to exclude Netflix make them look insular and outdated.
Netflix stepped in and started making the films the studios don’t want to. Netflix are not perfect, serious attention should be given to the buy-out deals they favour, but they’re making the films the theatrical model is ignoring.
This is a great little film. Moving and inspirational in so many ways. I struggle to see where else it would get made other than Netflix.

Steven Spielberg has called for a tightening of Academy rules, to prevent films like Roma, a Netflix production, being eligible Academy Awards in the future.
Once you commit to a television format, you’re a TV movie. You certainly, if it’s a good show, deserve an Emmy, but not an Oscar. I don’t believe films that are just given token qualifications in a couple of theaters for less than a week should qualify for the Academy Award nomination.
To answer the question “when is a movie not a move?” I’d say “when it’s doesn’t get made”.
The low or no budget films that would’ve once been picked up and distributed theatrically by a studio, through their one of their subsidiaries just aren’t anymore.
The risk averse studios are obsessed with the franchise model. Who can blame them? The franchises has a better chance of returning a massive profit, much more than some unknown independent film that needs to build an audience.
I think this is where Netflix has thrived. It’s given a home to independent cinema forgotten by the studios. What we need to realise is the platform doesn’t define the scope or vision of the films it shows, it’s just how people get to see them.
Netflix is not the villain in this scenario, it’s giving the Spielberg’s of the future a chance to make their Duel. It gives people a chance to see something outside of the very narrow trajectory offered by films that maker it to the cinema.
Whatever Spielberg thinks of Roma’s distribution, it was as cinematic an experience as anything I saw in a theatre last year. I think Spielberg needs to realise the filmic experience might not be exclusively theatrical, especially if the theatres are full of films that are nothing more than a roll-a-coaster ride.
Brandon Katz asks an interesting questing in the Observer. I’m gonna say Disney+, and whatever associated stream platforms it launches. With all of Disney’s recent acquisitions, Star Wars, Marvel, and Fox, it must have one the largest library of quality content available to any service. Drop into the mix decline of physical sales, sales Disney could withdraw from altogether. If they do, consumers will be forced to use their platforms, thus making Disney the biggest threat to Netflix.
You must be logged in to post a comment.